Filmaster

watch.review.share

Your Filmaster status

0%

You have rated 0/15 movies. Rate 15 more & find what to watch tonight, instantly!

Children of Men (UK, 2006)

'Children of Men' starts dull, and ends up boring.

That's the one line review for people in a hurry, and to be honest, is as much time as is worth spending on this poor effort.

It's the United Kingdom in 2027. Illegal immigrants (or should that be refugees?) threaten to overwhelm society. The government has tight control over the population and most importantly, women are no longer fertile. Why does it matter? How did it happen? Who knows? Who cares? Through the usual plot device of a combination of unfortunate circumstances Theo (Clive Owen) ends up with the job of escorting the one pregnant female in the world to safety.

It doesn't start well. Clive Owen seems a bit stiff and self-conscious. However, after some awkward expositional dialogue to make sure we all understand where we are and what's going on, we're off. Michael Caine and Julianne Moore turn up and real acting can be observed on the screen. Unfortunately both Caine and Moore are dead by the half-way mark, which leaves little to look forward to.

For the second half of the film, we have to make do with the woeful Owen, in the company of a cartoon-like ooh-lordy-dear-have-your-waters-broken, chanting earth mother, and the pregnant woman herself. Fortunately the earth mother also dies well before the end. This leaves a final half hour filled with Owen and pregnant woman dodging bullets in an interminable battle scene. Into one room, out of another. Up, down. You get the idea, usual boring stuff. And of course, in the midst of all this, in graphic detail, a child is born. Yuk, yuk, yuk. The birth of the child has an unexpected positive effect. Next to the horrible, horrible overacting by the entirety of the rest of the cast, Owen doesn't look so bad.

There's more than a sprinkling of Monty Python in all this. If you remember the People's Front of Judea from 'The Life of Brian', you'll be tickled by the scene where the Fish (what kind of a stupid name is that?) hold their 'how do we save the world meeting?'. And the car chase across the British countryside reminded me a lot of 'Clockwise'. OK, not Monty Python, but close enough.

Two more grumps. The bloody animals. They're all over the place. There's bloody cats, dogs, cows. There's the obligatory flock of sheep running wild through the desolate streets of London which generally signifies the end of the world as we know it, when you've run out of other ideas. Of course most of these animals have an unexplained mystical affinity for Owen. Then there's the irritating quasi-religious soundtrack, which I imagine is supposed to imbue the film with some kind of universal message of sacred significance. It's just annoying.

Today, four years after its release, 'Children of Men' stands at number 194 in the imdb top 250. Above 'Mystic River', above 'Rocky', and above 'King Kong'. It looks like society really is headed in the wrong direction.

Log in to comment

Pippin2010 Pippin2010

Oh wow, clio. As they say over here sometimes, "Harsh, dude." Can't glom onto this one, and you and I usually are somewhere in the same ball park. Can't say I loved the film, but I really liked it because I liked the ambition of the plot, wherein I actually thought a bit more exposition was needed, as well as Owen's performance. I also thought it wasn't boring, thanks largely to Cuaron's handheld, point-and-shoot style, and the screenplay itself, at least as far as the dialogue, struck me as mature and well constructed. Wondering where - and why, really - the movie lost you so quickly. Self-conscious acting (if you say so) on Owen's part aside, where did this film go south for you? What prompted you to watch it to begin with? A '2' just seems so brutal, and I remember being moved by this film. And really depressed, but that's probably to be expected. I read what you said, but I just didn't see the same movie. Sometimes that can happen, but phew!

And as much as I love Monty Python, especially The Life of Brian, I didn't make such a connection. Interesting.

.

michuk michuk

I also was quite disappointed by the film but I think you went too far. It had an interesting idea, some good cinematography and the shooting scene you call "usual boring stuff" was quite thrilling.
The ending was awful and I also hated the way people talked and acted but giving it a 2 of of 10 is a bit harsh.

.

cliodhna cliodhna

I suspected I might be in a minority with this one :) Pippin, I read your review before I posted mine, and I was a bit suprised we differed so much. It was a bit of a 'did we see the same film' feeling. Maybe watching it for the first time 4 years after the release changes things.

Yes, the dialogue. I ran out of space to write about that. I particularly remember the: 'You OK' - 'I'm OK' - 'We're OK' - 'It's OK' sequence.

It's definitely in the 'wasted 90 minutes of my life' category, so the 2 sticks.

In fact, I watched it because I think that the premise is plausible. I think humankind will become infertile (but it will be the men, not the women) and I was curious to see how the film handled it.

.

Pippin2010 Pippin2010

Hmm. Well, this inspired me to look the movie up at Rotten Tomatoes, a site I also love and go to sometimes to determine whether or not a movie is going to be for me. It's got a 93 % (fresh), and there are many glowing reviews or, at least, praising reviews, but there are smatterings of reviews in there, including this one from the New York Observer: http://www.observer.com/node/36569, that had the same reaction as you did, clio. It's interesting that a film could create such a broad spectrum of reaction, which is sometimes to be expected, though, perhaps, not to this degree. If I were willing, which I'm not (because I really do remember feeling quite depressed after seeing this one), I'd watch it again and see if I feel any differently. Incidentally, michuk posted the review on the facebook page, and there is some discussion/reaction to your review there too. Ah well, that's why film is great, because it can elicit so many different viewpoints...and good discussion.

.

Gilles_de_Rais Gilles_de_Rais

FWIW, I feel like Pippin. OK, I tend to like Owen in almost anything but...

Children of Men is certainly fairly depressing. It's not particularly exciting or incredible once you got the "first pregnant in 25 years" bit.

Still, it's a decent movie, it's adult/mature in its approach and it just misses a little bit of something to really make it come alive. A bit more plot, I think. Characterisation, dialogue and action levels being perfectly OK.

.

Log in to comment or connect with Sign up with Facebook